The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR
exchange-traded fund (XLY) was
No. 9 (meaning dead last) by return among the ETFs that divide the S&P 500
into nine pieces during the first third of this year, as its adjusted closing
share price dipped to $63.84 from $66.62, a drop of -$2.78, or -4.17 percent.
Over this period, XLY’s negative return compared
(unfavorably) with the positive returns of the Utilities SPDR ETF (XLU) and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF
(SPY), as described in “XLU Coppock Guide: Bullish as of May Day 2014.”
(XLU returned 14.74 percent, and SPY returned 2.41 percent.)
Figure 1: XLY And Its
Coppock Guide, The Complete History
Note: The XLY
closing-value scale is on the left, and the Coppock guide scale is on the
right.
Source: This J.J.’s
Risky Business chart is based on
proprietary analyses of Yahoo Finance adjusted monthly share-price data and those data themselves.
Edwin S. Coppock built his long-term guide not to flash both bullish
and bearish signals but to generate only bullish signals. However, I employ it
to produce either bullish or nonbullish signals. It is extremely important to keep
in mind that a nonbullish signal is not
equivalent to a bearish signal in the context of the guide.
I anticipate XLY may rise after a bullish signal and expect
it might do anything following a nonbullish signal (i.e., trade higher, lower
or sideways).
Figure 2: XLY’s
Behavior Subsequent To Initial Bullish Signals
Source: This J.J.’s
Risky Business chart is based on
proprietary analyses of Yahoo Finance adjusted monthly share-price data.
The XLY Coppock guide’s initial bullish signals collectively
have done a fair job in forecasting the future upward movements of the ETF on
monthly closing bases. In 11 cases since November 2000, these signals have been
correct on seven occasions, or 63.64 percent of the time, and incorrect on four
occasions, or 36.36 percent of the time.
Figure 3: XLY’s
Behavior Subsequent To Initial Nonbullish Signals
Source: This J.J.’s
Risky Business chart is based on
proprietary analyses of Yahoo Finance adjusted monthly share-price data.
The XLY Coppock guide’s initial nonbullish signals collectively
have compiled an interesting track record since November 2000. As customary, it
is important to keep in mind a nonbullish signal is not equivalent to a bearish signal in the context of the Coppock
guide. In the wake of 11 initial nonbullish signals over the years, the ETF’s
share price on monthly closing bases fell on seven occasions, or 63.64 percent
of the time, and rose on four occasions, or 36.36 percent of the time.
The XLY Coppock guide’s latest initial nonbullish signal
flashed in February, when the ETF’s closing share price was $66.63. Accounting
for the one-month lag in the confirmation of any signal, XLY’s closing share
price sank to $63.84 in April from $64.72 in March, which clearly constitutes nonbullish
action by any standard.
Intriguingly, the XLY Coppock guide’s initial signals moved
from nonbullish in December to bullish in January to nonbullish in February. In
an episode both similar and different, the guide’s signals experienced oscillation
in three consecutive months only once before in their history. In 2006, they
whipsawed from bullish in May to nonbullish in June to bullish in July. The ETF’s
share price hit a long-term peak 10 months later, which leads me to wonder
about when it will reach its next long-term trough.
Coppock Guide: The
Blog Series
Related Reading
Author’s Note: This is
the ninth blog post in a May series centered on the Coppock guides of 13
important ETFs, among them all nine Select Sector SPDRs. The first was
cross-posted at both J.J.’s Risky Business and
J.J. McGrath’s Instablog on Seeking Alpha, but the rest of the series will be posted here. You can follow me
(and the series) @JJMcGrath3000 on Twitter, at JJMcGrath on StockTwits and via myself on Google+.
Disclaimer: The opinions
expressed herein by the author do not constitute an investment recommendation,
and they are unsuitable for employment in the making of investment decisions.
The opinions expressed herein address only certain aspects of potential
investment in any securities and cannot substitute for comprehensive investment
analysis. The opinions expressed herein are based on an incomplete set of
information, illustrative in nature, and limited in scope. In addition, the
opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s best judgment as of the date of
publication, and they are subject to change without notice.
