Showing posts with label #XLB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #XLB. Show all posts

Monday, October 20, 2014

Risky Business Monitor: Oct. 20, 2014

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard appeared to halt the equity market’s latest period of adjustment with comments on Bloomberg Television Thursday about the Federal Open Market Committee possibly considering the continuation of its current quantitative-easing program, aka QE3+.

A nonvoter on the FOMC this year, Bullard told Bloomberg: “Inflation expectations are declining in the U.S. That’s an important consideration for a central bank. And for that reason I think that a logical policy response at this juncture may be to delay the end of the QE.”

The FOMC will announce its choice concerning QE3+ Oct. 29. If its members agree with Bullard’s position, then I believe the current stock-market bubble can remain inflated a while longer. If its members disagree with Bullard’s position, then I think the bubble will commence deflating immediately thereafter.

Meanwhile, our droogies at Seeking Alpha published six of my articles focused on Select Sector SPDR exchange-traded funds since the Risky Business Monitor linkfest last week, as follows:







Related Reading





Shameless Self-Promotion! If you like my work, then you can follow me as J.J. McGrath at Google+ and Seeking Alpha, as JJMcGrath at StockTwits and @JJMcGrath3000 at Twitter. If you do not like my work, then you can follow me at all those places, anyway.

Monday, July 21, 2014

Risky Business Monitor: July 21, 2014

Ralph Waldo Emerson’s cogent observation that “[a] foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds” notwithstanding, I note that if I have said it once, then I have said it a zillion times: I hate redundancy. Nonetheless, I acknowledge my most recent J.J.’s Risky Business blog post bears more than a passing resemblance to my most recent J.J. McGrath’s Instablog post at Seeking Alpha, as reflected by the following recapitulated ruminations:

The Select Sector SPDRs carving the S&P 500 into nine slices may be unique in the exchange-traded fund universe: They serve not only as investing and trading vehicles but also as equity-market indicators, lagging, coincident and leading. Accordingly, I keep an eye (or two) on them at all times.

A few results of this many-faceted observation process can be found in a recent series of articles published at Seeking Alpha. In each of the nine pieces, I focus on a single sector SPDR: its behavior in the first half of this year relative to its parent’s proxy, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), and all its siblings; its average monthly performances during the first full 15 years of its existence; and market-moving issues likely to have an effect on it in the foreseeable future (e.g., changes in policy at the U.S. Federal Reserve).

If you employ the sector SPDRs as market indicators, then you might want to read all of these articles. If you use a given sector SPDR as either an investing or a trading vehicle, then you might want to read the piece related to it. In any case, all nine of them are accessible via the hyperlinks appearing below:










Related Reading



Monday, July 14, 2014

Risky Business Monitor: July 14, 2014


One way I have attempted to cut my risk in the financial markets during the past 11 years is by developing the Risky Business Daily Market Seismometer (and its forerunners). Each and every day, I assess the condition of the equity market by bringing up-to-date an assortment of spreadsheets based on multiple stock-market metrics.

This assessment is based partially on examination of these metrics as they apply to the Select Sector SPDR exchange-traded funds that break the S&P 500 into nine chunks. These sector SPDRs are the subjects of most articles appearing in the Risky Business Monitor this week, as follows:








Related Reading



Wednesday, May 7, 2014

XLB Coppock Guide: Bullish as of May Day 2014

The Materials Select Sector SPDR exchange-traded fund (XLB) ranked No. 4 by return among the ETFs that divide the S&P 500 into nine pieces during the first third of this year, as its adjusted closing share price progressed to $47.67 from $46.04, a yield of $1.63, or 3.54 percent.

Over this period, XLB’s return was a bit less than one-quarter that of the Utilities SPDR ETF (XLU) and a bit less than 1-1/2 times that of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), as described in “XLU Coppock Guide: Bullish as of May Day 2014.” (XLU returned 14.74 percent, and SPY returned 2.41 percent.)

XLB is the fourth of 13 ETFs to be featured in a J.J.’s Risky Business blog series this month. Basically, I will be looking at each ETF with both eyes fixed on its Coppock guide, as was the case in “SPY Coppock Guide: Away From Bullishness, Toward Nonbullishness as of March 31, 2014.” The Coppock guide, aka either the Coppock curve or the Coppock indicator, is a long-term indicator of price movements in major stock-market indexes.

Figure 1: XLB And Its Coppock Guide, The Complete History

 photo
0031-Figure1-580_zps1be7a46a.png

Note: The XLB closing-value scale is on the left, and the Coppock guide scale is on the right.

Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on proprietary analyses of Yahoo Finance adjusted monthly share-price data and those data themselves.

Edwin S. Coppock developed his long-term guide not to flash both bullish and bearish signals but to generate only bullish signals. However, I employ it to produce either bullish or nonbullish signals. It is extremely important to keep in mind that a nonbullish signal is not equivalent to a bearish signal in the context of the guide.

I anticipate XLB may rise after a bullish signal and expect it might do anything following a nonbullish signal (i.e., trade higher, lower or sideways).

Figure 2: XLB’s Behavior Subsequent To Initial Bullish Signals

 photo 0031-Figure2-580_zpsd2fa827c.png

Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on proprietary analyses of Yahoo Finance adjusted monthly share-price data.

The XLB Coppock guide’s initial bullish signals collectively have done an almost-perfect job in forecasting the future upward movements of the ETF on monthly closing bases. In 12 cases since November 2000, these signals have been correct on 11 occasions, or 91.67 percent of the time, and incorrect on one occasion, or 8.33 percent of the time.

The Coppock guide’s latest initial bullish signal flashed last June, when XLB’s closing share price was $37.77. Factoring in the one-month lag in the confirmation of any signal, I note the ETF’s closing share price advanced to the aforementioned $47.67 in April from $39.87 in July, which clearly constitutes bullish action by any standard.

Figure 3: XLB’s Behavior Subsequent To Initial Nonbullish Signals

 photo
0031-Figure3-580_zps8427b9f6.png

Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on proprietary analyses of Yahoo Finance adjusted monthly share-price data.

The XLB Coppock guide’s initial nonbullish signals collectively have compiled a pretty mixed track record when evaluated on monthly closing bases. Again, it is extremely important to keep in mind that a nonbullish signal is not equivalent to a bearish signal in the context of the Coppock guide. Following the generation of 11 initial nonbullish signals since November 2000, the ETF’s share price has fallen on six occasions, or 54.55 percent of the time, and risen on five occasions, or 45.45 percent of the time.

Factoid o’ the Day: Five of the 11 XLB Coppock guide’s initial nonbullish signals have been produced in the merry month of May (in 2002, 2004, 2009, 2010 and 2013).

Coppock Guide: The Blog Series




Related Reading



Author’s Note: This is the fourth blog post in a May series centered on the Coppock guides of 13 important ETFs, among them all nine Select Sector SPDRs. The first was cross-posted at both J.J.’s Risky Business and J.J. McGrath’s Instablog on Seeking Alpha, but the rest of the series will be posted here. You can follow me (and the series) @JJMcGrath3000 on Twitter, at JJMcGrath on StockTwits and via myself on Google+.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein by the author do not constitute an investment recommendation, and they are unsuitable for employment in the making of investment decisions. The opinions expressed herein address only certain aspects of potential investment in any securities and cannot substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. The opinions expressed herein are based on an incomplete set of information, illustrative in nature, and limited in scope. In addition, the opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s best judgment as of the date of publication, and they are subject to change without notice.